British Petroleum, BP is in trouble. Financial Times have two recent articles that report environmental negligence, loose worker safety standards, and a general tendency to cover things up and obstruct inspections (pay per view content, unfortunately). This behavior contrasts sharply with the responsible environmentally friendly image of itself that BP has been trying to promote in it Beyond Petroleum campaign. (For a critique of this campaign click here.)The reason for such misbehavior seems to be the general difficulty in enforcing regulation of multinational oil companies, together with cost-cutting pressures (particularly in the 1990s when oil prices were low). All in all, BP seems to regard social responsibility as a matter of PR, easily dealt with by investing in posh advertising campaigns. But the company obviously lacks an instrument that would enable it to take the cost of behaving unethically into its economic calculations. Actics would be a wonderful motivator for them (and for the rest of the oil industry). It would give them a direct feedback on the costs of their actions, internally,in term of diminishing loyalty and motivation among employees, and externally in terms of a tainted reputation. This way Actics could supplement state regulation with the regulatory power of the collective intelligence of the networked public.